I have been watching a lot of the Olympics and loving it.
One thing I have noticed as I watch in real time is a growing trend of brands using social network URLs instead of their own. Below are examples from Uniball and Toyota. I remember seeing another for an upcoming movie but I forgot the name and campaign.
The first example is Uniball which makes pens and pushes people to their Facebook page for more info. They do not have a copy of the commercial online (that I could find) which is the first problem. The second is that if you visit their corporate site www.uniball.com there is no mention of the ad either or the Facebook page.
The URL that is getting so much airtime is below
Facebook.com/uniball
Going to the Facebook page you can either login to connect with and become a fan of Uniball or click through to enter your information to get a free pen.
What is the metric of success here? Free pen signups? Facebook page fans?
The second is a bigger brand, Toyota, pushing people to their YouTube page Youtube.com/toyota (via @amandapey)
In this case the video page automatically starts playing the commercial. If the metric of success is eyeballs on the video, this page behavior is artificially inflating the “videos watched” number. It is also notable that you cannot embed the videos from here but only share via a YouTube link.
So what is the advertising goal of these campaigns?
What are the metrics of success?
How do you measure accountability and targeting?
I am not suggesting that sending folks to another companies domain is a bad idea in all cases, but I wonder the value of have non integrated campaigns running and potentially confusing customers. It is tough to have a sound message across all platforms, but it should be considered when people search for, interact with, and ultimately buy from your brand in so many different places.


February 23, 2010
Advertise Different, Brands, Technology