Change the world vs. Fix the world

June 15, 2009

Marketing.fm

I had an interesting conversation over the weekend that got me thinking about two different types of people. Some want to fundamentally change the world and others want to fix the world.

Some people want to create products and companies that enter the world and destroy current value chains disrupting the current flow and create a better way. To me these are the world changers because they want to do things differently, stir things up, and turn processes over to make them better. They are not adding a product or service on top of something that exists today, they are creating something new.

Other people look at a current value chain, company dynamic, or enterprise system and want to bring efficiency, change, and speed where it does not currently exist. To me these are the world fixers because while nothing is really changing, they are bringing a valuable (and arguably more monetizable) business into the world. They bring processes and solutions to the world changers creations – an important part of the ecosystem.

While the nuances are very different, I do not want to get lost in the details of how and why these types of people are similar.

Both involve a very specific plan and goal, and strong narrative about why they will be successful. Both also require two different types of investments theses. One is theoretically more early stage and perhaps higher risk, while the other is perhaps more later stage and while just as risky, a different set of economic fundamentals and principals are involved with each.

So which are you?

Subscribe

Subscribe!

  • http://thelostjacket.com Stuartfoster

    Love this conversation, because I've noticed this as well. I'm naturally a fixer. Although I like to think of myself as a changer occasionally. As a marketer it's tough not to be a fixer (especially when you are trying to create solutions for existing products).

  • http://www.marketing.fm EricFriedman

    I think that exactly the point – its a great market to go after because the
    world is already going down that path and you are setting up to make it
    easier. Changing the world means making people change their current
    behavior, and thats a much harder prospect.

  • mgnyc

    I'm definitely a fixxer. One of my mantra's is “you can't make people do what they don't want to do”. Eric I might argue that “world/game changers” are just more creative fixers in the hierarchy. Big picture- I think new technology addresses existing demand, just in a better way. One could argue that a “world changer” requires creating new demand without cannibalizing existing technology. Can you think of one? The ipod only replaced the walkman, the combustible engine replaced the horse.

    Regards and thanks for the great post,

    MG

  • http://www.marketing.fm EricFriedman

    I think the example that pops to mind is Twitter. Its an obviously biased example, but with that disclosure aside, I think that creating any new platform is creating new demand, while a “better version” is a fix.

    Sometimes you can have a world changer in a product like the iPod which I would argue never had the ecosystem of music and media necessary to survive and thrive so Apple created on. The walkman as a device was superceded, but not only by another “better” device, but rather an entire ecosystem and platform to help it survive – ipoditunes.

    I will leave the flaws of the walled garden for another conversation :)

  • mgnyc

    Eric,

    I get your point with new platforms equating to change vs. fix, ie. the DVD player over VHS was a game changer. Twitter may very well be a “game changer”, ie. twitter over email, sms. In any event, Disqus is great little app/fix.

    Thanks again for the great post.

  • http://www.marketing.fm EricFriedman

    Thank you for your comments….its serious motivation.

  • huangqin
  • http://www.marketing.fm/2009/12/23/best-of-marketing-fm-2009/ Best of Marketing.fm 2009 | Marketing.fm – Eric Friedman

    [...] Change the world vs. Fix the world 9. Price, Quality, Time – Choose Two 8. Social Media Cleanup 7. Seamless Transition – moving [...]