http://www.marketing.fm/2008/04/02/welcome-to-the-widget-wars/ Technology, Startups, VC, Business Development - by Eric Friedman Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:36:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.marketing.fm/2008/04/02/welcome-to-the-widget-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-1493 Sidebar Real Estate » Eninvent Fri, 06 Mar 2009 00:46:16 +0000 http://www.marketing.fm/?p=770#comment-1493 [...] share of sidebar bling. I have written about some of them that are still around, written about the widget wars, and even had some sidebar items [...] [...] share of sidebar bling. I have written about some of them that are still around, written about the widget wars, and even had some sidebar items [...]

]]> http://www.marketing.fm/2008/04/02/welcome-to-the-widget-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-1492 How to use widgets to promote my business? « Be digital my friend Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:56:23 +0000 http://www.marketing.fm/?p=770#comment-1492 [...] Welcome to the Widget Wars [...] [...] Welcome to the Widget Wars [...]

]]> http://www.marketing.fm/2008/04/02/welcome-to-the-widget-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-4661 EricFriedman Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:03:05 +0000 http://www.marketing.fm/?p=770#comment-4661 That is actually a decent question. I think the generic term "widget" now<br>applys to things beyond the static ads that we used to see before. Anytime<br>you have server side interaction with a "widget" you can claim interactivity<br>with a user. People may not come out and say "give me more widgets" but<br>they may want "more functionality" That is actually a decent question. I think the generic term “widget” now
applys to things beyond the static ads that we used to see before. Anytime
you have server side interaction with a “widget” you can claim interactivity
with a user. People may not come out and say “give me more widgets” but
they may want “more functionality”

]]> http://www.marketing.fm/2008/04/02/welcome-to-the-widget-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-4660 phon Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:53:06 +0000 http://www.marketing.fm/?p=770#comment-4660 I have just one question. Do people actually want widgets? I have just one question. Do people actually want widgets?

]]> http://www.marketing.fm/2008/04/02/welcome-to-the-widget-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-3207 EricFriedman Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:03:05 +0000 http://www.marketing.fm/?p=770#comment-3207 That is actually a decent question. I think the generic term "widget" now<br>applys to things beyond the static ads that we used to see before. Anytime<br>you have server side interaction with a "widget" you can claim interactivity<br>with a user. People may not come out and say "give me more widgets" but<br>they may want "more functionality" That is actually a decent question. I think the generic term “widget” now
applys to things beyond the static ads that we used to see before. Anytime
you have server side interaction with a “widget” you can claim interactivity
with a user. People may not come out and say “give me more widgets” but
they may want “more functionality”

]]> http://www.marketing.fm/2008/04/02/welcome-to-the-widget-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-1491 EricFriedman Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:03:05 +0000 http://www.marketing.fm/?p=770#comment-1491 That is actually a decent question. I think the generic term "widget" now<br>applys to things beyond the static ads that we used to see before. Anytime<br>you have server side interaction with a "widget" you can claim interactivity<br>with a user. People may not come out and say "give me more widgets" but<br>they may want "more functionality" That is actually a decent question. I think the generic term “widget” now
applys to things beyond the static ads that we used to see before. Anytime
you have server side interaction with a “widget” you can claim interactivity
with a user. People may not come out and say “give me more widgets” but
they may want “more functionality”

]]> http://www.marketing.fm/2008/04/02/welcome-to-the-widget-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-1497 EricFriedman Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:03:05 +0000 http://www.marketing.fm/?p=770#comment-1497 That is actually a decent question. I think the generic term "widget" now<br>applys to things beyond the static ads that we used to see before. Anytime<br>you have server side interaction with a "widget" you can claim interactivity<br>with a user. People may not come out and say "give me more widgets" but<br>they may want "more functionality" That is actually a decent question. I think the generic term “widget” now
applys to things beyond the static ads that we used to see before. Anytime
you have server side interaction with a “widget” you can claim interactivity
with a user. People may not come out and say “give me more widgets” but
they may want “more functionality”

]]> http://www.marketing.fm/2008/04/02/welcome-to-the-widget-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-3206 phon Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:53:06 +0000 http://www.marketing.fm/?p=770#comment-3206 I have just one question. Do people actually want widgets? I have just one question. Do people actually want widgets?

]]> http://www.marketing.fm/2008/04/02/welcome-to-the-widget-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-1487 Marketing.fm » Watch the widget trends Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:16:52 +0000 http://www.marketing.fm/?p=770#comment-1487 [...] my recent article about being bullish on widgets I was asked a lot about supporting data. The article was primarily my own thoughts, but nonetheless [...] [...] my recent article about being bullish on widgets I was asked a lot about supporting data. The article was primarily my own thoughts, but nonetheless [...]

]]> http://www.marketing.fm/2008/04/02/welcome-to-the-widget-wars/comment-page-1/#comment-1490 phon Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:53:06 +0000 http://www.marketing.fm/?p=770#comment-1490 I have just one question. Do people actually want widgets? I have just one question. Do people actually want widgets?

]]>